Constipation | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 8.80 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 8.80 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.60 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.6 | |
Rebound tenderness | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 5.10 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 5.10 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.70 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.7 | |
Bowel sounds increased | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 3.50 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 3.50 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.70 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.7 | |
Bowel sound decreased | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 3.20 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 3.20 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.80 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.8 | |
Abdominal pain | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 2.90 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 2.90 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.80 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.8 | |
Abdominal Mass | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 2.20 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 2.20 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.90 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.9 | |
Vomiting | ||
Positive likelihood ratio 2.20 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 2.20 | Negative likelihood ratio 0.40 ( Bohner H et al. ) (average) 0.4 |
1. | Bohner H et al. Simple data from history and physical examination help to exclude bowel obstruction and to avoid radiographic studies in patients with acute abdominal pain. Eur J Surg. 1998 Oct;164(10):777-84 |
---|
2. | Cervellin G et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Oct; 4(19): 362 |
---|